Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- At risk (1)
- Beratung (1)
- Coaching (1)
- Early child development (1)
- Early regulatory problems (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Frühkindliche Regulationsstörung (1)
- Gefährdung (1)
- Kind (1)
- Kleinkind (1)
- Maternal distress (1)
- Mother-child-interaction (1)
- Mutter (1)
- Personalentwicklung (1)
- Stress (1)
Institute
- Fakultät V - Diakonie, Gesundheit und Soziales (2) (remove)
Was bedeutet es beratungswissenschaftlich und beratungspraktisch, wenn
wie bei Astrid Schreyögg Coaching als Instrument einer Personalentwicklung im Sinne Oswald Neubergers verstanden wird, der ausdrücklich betont: „Der Mensch ist Mittel. Punkt.“ Wie ist ein solches Coachingverständnis diskursanalytisch zuzuordnen, in dem eine bestimmte Arbeits‐ und Organisationspsychologie sich in den Dienst eines bestimmten Verständnisses von Personalwirtschaft stellt? Wie wirkt sich dies in der konkreten Beratungspraxis aus? Welches Menschenbild liegt einem solchen Coaching zugrunde? Lassen sich historisch Modelle rekonstruieren, in denen psychologische Methoden und Techniken im Interesse einer bestimmten ökonomistischen Weltanschauung und Haltung instrumentalisiert wurden? Der Autor vertritt die These, dass „Psychotechnik“ und „Menschenökonomie“ aus den 1910er‐ und 1920er‐Jahren charakteristische Ähnlichkeiten mit einem personalentwicklungsorientierten Coaching aufweisen, wie es Schreyögg unter Rückgriff auf Neubergers Lehrbuch vertritt.
Background:
This study examined the extent to which regulatory problems in infants at 4 and 6 months influence childhood development at 12 months. The second aim of the study was to examine the influence maternal distress has on 4-month-old children’s subsequent development as well as gender differences with regard to regulatory problems and development.
Methods:
153 mother-child dyads enrolled in the family support research project “Nobody slips through the net” constituted the comparison group. These families faced psychosocial risks (e.g. poverty, excessive demands on the mother, and mental health disorders of the mother, measured with the risk screening instrument Heidelberger Belastungsskala - HBS) and maternal stress, determined with the Parental Stress Index (PSI-SF). The children’s developmental levels and possible early regulatory problems were evaluated by means of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and a German questionnaire assessing problems of excessive crying along with sleeping and feeding difficulties (SFS).
Results:
A statistically significant but only low, inverse association between excessive crying, whining and sleep problems at 4 and 6 months and the social development of one-year-olds (accounting for 5% and 8% of the variance respectively) was found. Feeding problems had no effect on development. Although regulatory problems in infants were accompanied by increased maternal stress level, these did not serve as a predictor of the child’s social development at 12 months. One-year-old girls reached a higher level of development in social and fine motor skills. No gender differences were found with regard to regulatory problems, nor any moderating effect of gender on the relation between regulatory problems and level of development.
Conclusions:
Our results reinforce existing knowledge pertaining to the transactional association between regulatory problems in infants, maternal distress and dysfunctionality of mother-child interactions. They also provide evidence of a slight but distinct negative influence of crying and sleeping problems on children’s subsequent social development. Easily accessible support services provided by family health visitors (particularly to the so-called “at-risk families”) are strongly recommended to help prevent the broadening of children’s early regulatory problems into other areas of behavior.