Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (69)
- Working Paper (66)
- Article (54)
- Bachelor Thesis (47)
- Report (34)
- Master's Thesis (24)
- Book (19)
- Study Thesis (10)
- Course Material (9)
- Preprint (7)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Lecture (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (353)
Keywords
- Digitalisierung (16)
- E-Learning (16)
- Korruption (12)
- Agilität <Management> (11)
- Führung (11)
- Grader (11)
- Herbarium (11)
- Programmierung (11)
- Autobewerter (10)
- Computerunterstütztes Lernen (10)
Institute
- Fakultät IV - Wirtschaft und Informatik (353) (remove)
Objective
The study’s objective was to assess factors contributing to the use of smart devices by general practitioners (GPs) and patients in the health domain, while specifically addressing the situation in Germany, and to determine whether, and if so, how both groups differ in their perceptions of these technologies.
Methods
GPs and patients of resident practices in the Hannover region, Germany, were surveyed between April and June 2014. A total of 412 GPs in this region were invited by email to participate via an electronic survey, with 50 GPs actually doing so (response rate 12.1%). For surveying the patients, eight regional resident practices were visited by study personnel (once each). Every second patient arriving there (inclusion criteria: of age, fluent in German) was asked to take part (paper-based questionnaire). One hundred and seventy patients participated; 15 patients who did not give consent were excluded.
Results
The majority of the participating patients (68.2%, 116/170) and GPs (76%, 38/50) owned mobile devices. Of the patients, 49.9% (57/116) already made health-related use of mobile devices; 95% (36/38) of the participating GPs used them in a professional context. For patients, age (P < 0.001) and education (P < 0.001) were significant factors, but not gender (P > 0.99). For doctors, neither age (P = 0.73), professional experience (P > 0.99) nor gender (P = 0.19) influenced usage rates. For patients, the primary use case was obtaining health (service)-related information. For GPs, interprofessional communication and retrieving information were in the foreground. There was little app-related interaction between both groups.
Conclusions
GPs and patients use smart mobile devices to serve their specific interests. However, the full potentials of mobile technologies for health purposes are not yet being taken advantage of. Doctors as well as other care providers and the patients should work together on exploring and realising the potential benefits of the technology.
Objective: The study’s objective was to assess factors contributing to the use of smart devices by general practitioners (GPs) and patients in the health domain, while specifically addressing the situation in Germany, and to determine whether, and if so, how both groups differ in their perceptions of these technologies.
Methods: GPs and patients of resident practices in the Hannover region, Germany, were surveyed between April and June 2014. A total of 412 GPs in this region were invited by email to participate via an electronic survey, with 50 GPs actually doing so (response rate 12.1%). For surveying the patients, eight regional resident practices were visited by study personnel (once each). Every second patient arriving there (inclusion criteria: of age, fluent in German) was asked to take part (paper-based questionnaire). One hundred and seventy patients participated; 15 patients who did not give consent were excluded.
Results: The majority of the participating patients (68.2%, 116/170) and GPs (76%, 38/50) owned mobile devices. Of the patients, 49.9% (57/116) already made health-related use of mobile devices; 95% (36/38) of the participating GPs used them in a professional context. For patients, age (P<0.001) and education (P<0.001) were significant factors, but not gender (P>0.99). For doctors, neither age (P¼0.73), professional experience (P>0.99) nor gender (P¼0.19) influenced usage rates. For patients, the primary use case was obtaining health (service)-related information. For GPs, interprofessional communication and retrieving information were in the foreground. There was little app-related interaction between both groups.
Conclusions: GPs and patients use smart mobile devices to serve their specific interests. However, the full potentials of mobile technologies for health purposes are not yet being taken advantage of. Doctors as well as other care providers and the patients should work together on exploring and realising the potential benefits of the technology.
Herausgeberwerk (Litzcke & Schuh): 1. Modewellen des Managements 2. Wohin die Reise geht - Folgen des Wertewandels für die Führungskräfteentwicklung 3. Umgang mit Veränderungen - Psychologie für ein erfolgreiches Changemanagement 4. Weiterentwicklung des öffentlichen Dienstes durch Evaluation 5. Qualiätsmanagement im Bundesnachrichtendienst 6. Unternehmen BfV - Realität oder Trugschluss?
In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird auf eine per Gesetz vorgeschriebene Frauenquote in Deutschland eingegangen. Im Fokus steht die Frage, ob Frauendiskriminierung durch eine solche Vorschrift tatsächlich bekämpft werden kann oder ob vielmehr die Männer diskriminiert würden. Zudem werden mögliche Unterschiede in den Führungsstilen zwischen Frauen und Männern untersucht sowie einige bereits vorhandene Frauenquoten in Politik und Wirtschaft vorgestellt.
Vergleich von nativer App- und Cross-Platform-Entwicklung (Facebook React Native und Google Flutter)
(2020)
Die Entwicklung mobiler Applikationen für iOS und Android ist in der Regel mit viel Arbeit verbunden, da man für beide Plattformen gezwungenermaßen unterschiedlichen Quelltext schreiben muss. Abhilfe für dieses Problem schaffen Cross-Platform-Frameworks wie React Native von Facebook oder Flutter von Google. Anhand dieser Frameworks lassen sich Apps für beide Plattformen mit nur einer Codebase entwickeln. Eine kritische Stelle und oft gebrauchtes Kontra-Argument gegen die Entwicklung mit Cross-Platform-Frameworks ist die Hardwarenähe der nativen Applikationen, an welcher es den Frameworks vermeintlich mangelt. Doch wie ist der Stand der Dinge im Jahr 2020? Können Cross-Platform-Frameworks inzwischen performant und einfach auf Hardwarekomponenten zugreifen und machen damit die mühsame, native Entwicklung für iOS und Android vor allem in Anbetracht der Entwicklung von größerer Enterprise-Software obsolet?
Dieser Frage wird in dieser Arbeit nachgegangen und generell überprüft wie tauglich die Cross-Platform-Entwicklung ist. Nach dem Lesen dieser Bachelorarbeit sollte entschieden werden können, ob Cross-Platform-Frameworks für das Anwendungsproblem des Lesers geeignet sind. Um die Forschungsfrage zu beantworten, wurden je zwei Applikationen im Rahmen einer Fallstudie für je iOS und Android entwickelt, damit geprüft werden konnte, wie förderlich die zuvor genannten Frameworks sind. Der Fokus der Arbeit liegt also auf der Güte bzw. dem heutigen Stand der Cross-Platform-Entwicklung, vor allem im Bezug auf die Benutzung von Hardwarekomponenten bzw. betriebssystemspezifischen Diensten (Bluetooth, Kamera, etc.).
Die Ergebnisse der Fallstudie zeigen, dass es stets auf den Kontext und die Komplexität der zu realisierenden Anwendung ankommt inwiefern Cross-Platform-Frameworks verwendet werden können. In simplen Anwendungsfällen können Frameworks meist zu einer erheblichen Kostenminimierung und Zeitersparnis führen, wohingegen bei komplexeren Anwendungen relativ schnell Grenzen und starke Abhängigkeiten erreicht werden.
Hadoop is a Java-based open source programming framework, which supports the processing and storage of large volumes of data sets in a distributed computing environment. On the other hand, an overwhelming majority of organizations are moving their big data processing and storing to the cloud to take advantage of cost reduction – the cloud eliminates the need for investing heavily in infrastructures, which may or may not be used by organizations. This paper shows how organizations can alleviate some of the obstacles faced when trying to make Hadoop run in the cloud.
Our work is motivated primarily by the lack of standardization in the area of Event Processing Network (EPN) models. We identify general requirements for such models. These requirements encompass the possibility to describe events in the real world, to establish temporal and causal relationships among the events, to aggregate the events, to organize the events into a hierarchy, to categorize the events into simple or complex, to create an EPN model in an easy and simple way and to use that model ad hoc. As the major contribution, this paper applies the identified requirements to the RuleCore model.
In this paper, five ontologies are described, which include the event concepts. The paper provides an overview and comparison of existing event models. The main criteria for comparison are that there should be possibilities to model events with stretch in the time and location and participation of objects; however, there are other factors that should be taken into account as well. The paper also shows an example of using ontologies in complex event processing.
OSGi in Cloud Environments
(2013)