Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (6) (remove)
Language
- English (6)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- Cloud Computing (2)
- API (1)
- Application Programming Interface (1)
- Auswahl (1)
- BaaS (Backend-as-a-service) (1)
- Big Data (1)
- Big Data Analytics (1)
- CI/CD (1)
- DevOps (1)
- Docker (1)
- EPN (1)
- Education (1)
- Event Processing Network (1)
- Event Processing Network Model (1)
- FaaS (Function-as-a-service) (1)
- Function as a Service (1)
- Hadoop (1)
- Istio (1)
- Kubernetes (1)
- MapReduce (1)
- Microservice (1)
- OpenStack (1)
- PageRank (1)
- Pregel (1)
- REST <Informatik> (1)
- RESTful (1)
- Representational State Transfer (1)
- Richardson Maturity Model (1)
- RuleCore (1)
- Serverless Computing (1)
- Service Mesh (1)
- Shortest Path (1)
- Softwarewerkzeug (1)
- Versicherungsbetrieb (1)
- Verteiltes System (1)
- Word Counting (1)
- build automation (1)
- build server (1)
- distributed systems (1)
- scaling (1)
- serverless architecture (1)
- serverless functions (1)
- service models (1)
- tool evaluation (1)
Institute
- Fakultät IV - Wirtschaft und Informatik (6) (remove)
In this paper we describe the selection of a modern build automation tool for an industry research partner of ours, namely an insurance company. Build automation has become increasingly important over the years. Today, build automation became one of the central concepts in topics such as cloud native development based on microservices and DevOps. Since more and more products for build automation have entered the market and existing tools have changed their functional scope, there is nowadays a large number of tools on the market that differ greatly in their functional scope. Based on requirements from our partner company, a build server analysis was conducted. This paper presents our analysis requirements, a detailed look at one of the examined tools and a summarizes our comparison of all three tools from our final comparison round.