Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Cognitive frames of depression and their association with accessibility to mental health communication: a cluster analysis for developing stigma-sensitive targeting strategies

  • Introduction: Depression is a globally prevalent mental disorder; however, the stigmatization of individuals experiencing depression remains a significant challenge. The effectiveness of mental health promotion efforts and anti-stigma messages is contingent upon individuals' existing beliefs and the stigmatizing potential of their attitudes. Thus, understanding how individuals perceive mental disorders such as depression, as well as their communicative accessibility, is vital from a strategic health communication standpoint. This study explored the prevailing cognitive frames regarding depression in Germany, and the corresponding affective reactions toward individuals experiencing depression. Differences in communicative accessibility, individuals' social proximity to the topic, as well as socioeconomic characteristics were used to inform stigma-sensitive targeting strategies. Method: A representative survey of the German adult population (N = 1,530) was conducted, using a vignette describing a person with symptoms of major depression. Factor and cluster analyses identified four distinct cognitive frames of depression, characterized by varying stigmatizing attitudes and attributions of responsibility. Results: The study has revealed that stigmatizing cognitive frames demonstrate lower receptivity to mental health information. Individuals with stigmatizing perspectives represent a significant portion of the population, have reduced receptivity to mental health information, and are likely to exhibit defensive or even negative affective responses to anti-stigma efforts. Discussion: The findings underscore the significance of considering cognitive frames as complex but suitable approaches for target group segmentation in mental health communication strategies. The development of tailored and creative low-threshold strategies fitting well within the cognitive frames of individuals with stigmatizing perspectives seems essential.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Anna FreytagORCiDGND, Eva Baumann, Stephanie Schindler, Matthias C. Angermeyer, Georg Schomerus
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:960-opus4-37019
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25968/opus-3701
DOI original:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1308281
ISSN:2297-900X
Parent Title (English):Frontiers in Communication
Publisher:Frontiers Media SA
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2024
Publishing Institution:Hochschule Hannover
Release Date:2025/10/01
GND Keyword:DepressionGND; StigmatisierungGND; GesundheitskommunikationGND; GesundheitsförderungGND; GesundheitserziehungGND; Cluster-AnalyseGND; ZielgruppeGND; MarketingGND
Volume:8
Article Number:1308281
Link to catalogue:1948038560
Institutes:Fakultät III - Medien, Information und Design
DDC classes:150 Psychologie
610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International