Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial

  • Objective: To evaluate the impact of different dissemination channels on the awareness and usage of hospital performance reports among referring physicians, as well as the usefulness of such reports from the referring physicians’ perspective.
    Data sources/Study setting: Primary data collected from a survey with 277 referring physicians (response rate = 26.2%) in Nuremberg, Germany (03–06/2016).
    Study design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial at the practice level. Physician practices were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) physicians in the control arm could become aware of the performance reports via mass media channels (Mass Media, npr MM=132, nph MM=147); (2) physicians in the intervention arm also received a printed version of the report via mail (Mass and Special Media, npr MSM=117; nph MSM=130).
    Principal findings: Overall, 68% of respondents recalled hospital performance reports and 21% used them for referral decisions. Physicians from the Mass and Special Media group were more likely to be aware of the performance reports (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.16–8.00, p < .001) but not more likely to be influenced when referring patients into hospitals (OR 1.73; 95% CI 0.72–4.12, p > .05). On a 1 (very good) to 6 (insufficient) scale, the usefulness of the performance reports was rated 3.67 (±1.40). Aggregated presentation formats were rated more helpful than detailed hospital quality information.
    Conclusions: Hospital quality reports have limited impact on referral practices. To increase the latter, concerns raised by referring physicians must be given more weight. Those principally refer to the underlying data, the design of the reports, and the lack of important information.

Download full text files

Export metadata

  • Export Bibtex
  • Export RIS

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Martin Emmert, Nina Meszmer, Lisa Jablonski, Lena Zinth, Oliver Schöffski, Fatemeh Taheri-Zadeh
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:960-opus4-11523
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-017-0171-5
Parent Title (English):Health Economics Review
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2017
Release Date:2017/11/06
Tag:Hospital quality; Patient counselling; Patient referral; Public health; Public reporting
Volume:2017
Issue:7:33
Institutes:Fakultät III - Medien, Information und Design
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Licence (German):License Logo Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0